Photos
He doesn’t regret the stand he took then, but he wouldn’t make the same choice today.
The Parkland resident says the Army is ready to incorporate openly gay and lesbian service members in its ranks. Berndt, 82, thinks “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy will pass quietly into history when it ends next month and the military catches up to changing views of homosexuality.
“I was against gays in the military at the time, and my feeling at that time was when society accepts gays, then the military can accept gays,” he said, remembering his support for the National Guard’s discharge of then-Col. Margarethe Cammermeyer in 1992. “I think society’s changed.”
Berndt’s right, say Army officers at the largest military installation on the West Coast who’ve been briefing soldiers on new policies for openly gay service members.
Those officers at Joint Base Lewis-McChord anticipate a relatively easy transition for soldiers who have followed the national debate on whether to repeal don’t ask, don’t tell and grown more comfortable with the idea of gays serving openly in the military.
The 17-year-old policy requiring gay service members to hide their sexual preference is due to end Sept. 20. The base has completed its briefings on the new policy, as has the Washington National Guard, said Army spokesmen.
“There’s not a lot of change as far as I’m concerned,” said Capt. Ben Schneller, 30, who delivered a series of briefings at Lewis-McChord on the new policy as commander of the 472nd Signal Company in the 4th Battalion, 9 Infantry Regiment.
He said his 75 soldiers paid close attention during their 90-minute briefings and appeared ready for the policy shift.
“Hey it’s a change, and our job is to move out smartly and accomplish the mission, regardless of anything,” said Schneller, a Yelm resident who was raised in Puyallup.
“Repeal day” might pass without much official fuss at Lewis-McChord’s Army and Air Force units, but it’ll go off with celebrations around the country for gays and lesbians who’ve concealed their sexuality while serving in the armed forces. Cammermeyer, the colonel whose discharge Berndt supported, plans to attend a party that day in the nation’s capital.
She was a pioneer in fighting for gay rights in the military, and she won a landmark court case in 1994 that led to her reinstatement in the National Guard.
“I am so tired of being the lesbian rather just being a soldier or a nurse or whatever the title,” said Cammermeyer of Whidbey Island. “To be identified solely by your sexual orientation – my life is much, much broader than that.”
Schneller sounds confident that he can navigate the policy change as an infantry company commander, but he’ll have to work through a few gray areas that are arising because of the federal law that bars gay marriage.
For example, line commanders will have to decide whether to grant emergency leave in certain situations for gay soldiers if their partners become seriously ill. Schneller said he faces the same choice with any soldier whose relatives fall sick. It comes down to whether the company can accomplish its job without a part of its team.
More explicitly, gay soldiers won’t be able to use certain benefits for their partners that are provided to married, heterosexual soldiers. They include health insurance, a boost in a monthly housing allowance or the ability to have a gay partner live on base.
That disparity has gay rights groups such as the Courage Campaign highlighting the repeal of don’t ask, don’t tell in their push to overturn the federal law that bars homosexual marriage. They say the Defense of Marriage Act creates an unfair system for gay service members in committed relationships.
“The Defense of Marriage Act (which bars homosexual marriage) now more clearly than ever is the outlier that will prevent the military from doing its job efficiently,” Courage Campaign founder Rick Jacobs said last month when the Defense Department certified it was ready to repeal don’t ask, don’t tell.
The Defense Department is taking pains to tell service members which benefits they can assign to unmarried partners, such as death gratuities, life insurance and the right to appoint anyone as a designated caregiver. The Pentagon also says it’s reviewing whether it will need to make changes to other benefits.
Its briefings on the repeal of don’t ask, don’t tell included scenarios in which soldiers played out different circumstances in which a discussion of someone’s sexuality might come up during an assignment, such as a lesbian officer asking for housing benefits after having a child with her partner. That would be permissible because the officer could designate her partner as a primary caregiver to their child.
Another involved intervening to halt gay slurs.
Schneller said one of his younger soldiers stepped up during the scenario and said, “That’s wrong. We don’t tolerate discrimination or harassment in this unit.”
The military’s tradition as a national mixing pot could be a strength in working through the policy change, just as it could lead to some initial conflicts, said a retired airman from Orting who spoke on the condition of anonymity because his son is an Army officer who could face professional repercussions for speaking with the media.
The airman retired in 2001 and remembers the military as a place where locker-room talk could easily veer into anti-gay insults, especially among younger service members. The airman’s son shares that concern, he said.
“Just imagine the hazing that would take place,” he said. “Right now there would be a lot of hazing for anyone that doesn’t quite adhere to the norm. It’s almost like an elementary schoolyard until you get a little older.”
Army I Corps spokesman Lt. Col. Gary Dangerfield said the military will deal with derisive language directed at gays in the same way it addresses inappropriate conduct for all soldiers. Those standards haven’t changed, he said.
The retired airman believes openly gay service members eventually will be incorporated into the armed forces, but he thinks it’s a bad time to make the change while the country’s fighting two wars and is involved in numerous world conflicts.
“It’s another distraction from the job itself,” he said.
A Defense Department survey last year that concluded most service members believed ending don’t ask, don’t tell wouldn’t disrupt their units lent some weight to the Orting airman’s perspective. A majority of Marines in combat units opposed the change.
That was one of the main concerns Berndt, the retired command sergeant major, felt when he opposed incorporating openly gay service members during his career.
“I firmly believe that when a man’s in combat you have to depend on the guy on your right and on your left. I know we can depend on any trained soldier,” he said. “I don’t think 20 years ago or even 10 years ago soldiers were comfortable with the thought that the guy on the right could be gay.”
Since his retirement, he’s noticed popular culture becoming more open to gays and lesbians. He’s also seen less hate speech and violence directed at gays. That tells him that society’s ready to include gays in its military.
Cammermeyer appreciates the changing attitudes being expressed by active-duty service members and veterans, and she believes that don’t ask, don’t tell could have been repealed much earlier without opposition in Congress.
“Society is so far ahead of the military, especially for the young people,” she said. “In this instance, it’s like ‘So, what’s the problem?’”
Aside from the repeal, she’s looking forward to one more thing about the policy ending.
“Pretty soon we won’t have to talk about this ever again,” she said.
Adam Ashton: 253-597-8646
adam.ashton@thenewstribune.com
blog.thenewstribune.com/military
