Federal government can’t afford unnecessary costs

MARCIA WOLF; Olympia • Published August 21, 2011

  • 0 comments

The editorial “House GOP out of touch about support for conservation land” epitomizes the problem that currently confronts our nation.

Yes, it is nice to have parks and open spaces. However, each time the government buys such property, it is taken off the tax rolls and requires more government employees and tax revenue to manage it.

Bear in mind that about half of our state is already owned by various government entities and Native American tribes – 36 percent state and federal, 11 percent tribal and more for schools districts, counties and cities. Some other western states have even higher percentages of untaxed land.

The editorial criticizes House Republicans for writing a budget that includes only “a paltry $61 million” for the government to buy more land this year, instead of the $900 million recommended by President Barack Obama.

That, in a nutshell, is why we have a $14 trillion debt and are running an annual deficit of at least $1.6 trillion. Every time our elected representatives try to cut back on spending, there is an outcry about a worthy cause being shortchanged.

Of course one can make a good case for more parks and open space. The fact is that our federal government can’t presently afford it. We cannot always have everything that everyone wants. When our political representatives try to be responsible by cutting unnecessary costs, let’s not vilify them.

Similar stories:

  • Take unusable property off the tax roles

  • Plan for spotted owl targets rival bird species

  • Idaho Gov. Otter wants control of federal timber

  • Loss of coast zone program hurts state's beluga whale case

  • Pocket gopher decision must be based on solid evidence

COMMENTS Community Publishing Guidelines

Join the Reader Network

Do you want The Olympian to keep you in mind when we canvass the community for opinions?

Click here and sign up with our Reader Network to offer your view.

_