Lacey council will discuss 2012 water rates Thursday

NATE HULINGS | Staff writer • Published October 05, 2011

  • 0 comments

The Lacey City Council this week will begin discussing how much residents will pay for water services in 2012, and any increase likely will be equal to or less than the 4 percent spike seen this year, Finance Director Troy Woo said.

The increase for 2011 will generate about $250,000 in additional revenue for the city, helping repay debt and fund increased labor and operational costs.

The council will discuss the issue during its work session Thursday and provide direction to staffers. The 2012 rates will be a bridge until the city implements a five-year rate plan in 2013.

The council could decide not to increase water rates, a move that would force the city to dip into reserves. Woo said the water utility is one of the city’s most “financially challenged” funds.

The fund is on the hook for about $600,000 annually to repay a loan from the wastewater-construction fund to pay for the Hawks Prairie water-treatment plant. The fund will have to support some major capital improvements in the coming years, including ongoing water-line and valve replacement and projects tied to the city’s bid for water rights.

With those capital improvements looming, the city hired a consultant to develop a plan that would provide more predictability for rates, Woo said.

A final rate study is expected by early next year. Then the council will begin discussions to adopt a rate schedule prior to beginning work on the 2013 budget.

The city Finance Committee was briefed on water rate issues during its Sept. 26 meeting.

Council member Jeff Gadman, who sits on the committee, said that the council needs to look closely at the efficiency of operations before making a decision on rate increases, which he said should be a last resort. Last year’s vote to increase rates didn’t come without criticisms.

Then the council voted 5-2 to raise rates, with Andy Ryder and Cynthia Pratt voting no. Before the vote, Ryder stated that the city should have looked at other ways to reduce spending and that the increases were worst on businesses.

Council member Ron Lawson, who voted in favor of the increase, did so “begrudgingly,” saying that he wouldn’t vote to approve another rate increase until the economy improved.

His tune since has changed, with another year on the council and added knowledge of the city’s water issues sharpening his focus, he said in an interview Tuesday.

Lawson said an increase would be “unfortunate” but that he will take the issue seriously and will not look at it with a closed mind.

“I don’t know how much longer we can keep the same water rate and keep what we’re doing,” Lawson said.

Nate Hulings: 360-754-5476

nhulings@theolympian.com

www.theolympian.com/outsideoly

Similar stories:

  • Olympia council passes $111.6M budget that avoids major cuts

  • Olympia council members told city will begin 2013 about $1.7 million in hole

  • Olympia council considers tax increase amid budget shortfall

  • West Richland adopts parks plan

  • West Richland adopts parks plan

COMMENTS Community Publishing Guidelines

Join the Reader Network

Do you want The Olympian to keep you in mind when we canvass the community for opinions?

Click here and sign up with our Reader Network to offer your view.


TOP JOBS

All Top Jobs  »