Brad Shannon

Brad Shannon:
The Politics Blog

Brad Shannon maintains this blog. He is political editor at The Olympian and can be reached at 360-753-1688 or bshannon@theolympian.com.

UPDATE - Online school advocates sue over funding cuts

Brad Shannon | The Olympian • Published February 15, 2012

  • 0 comments

Advocates of online learning programs have sued Washington state in a bid to piggy back on the recent state Supreme Court ruling that said the Legislature had failed to meet its constitutional duty to fully pay for basic education.

The online learning lawsuit was filed in King County and is linked here. In a news release issued this week by Washington Families for Online Learning, which is linked here, former state Republican lawmaker Gigi Talcott of Lakewood and fellow activists say:

Since the establishment of online public school programs in 2005 via HB 5828, there has been no question that online learning is a delivery model for basic education under state law. Accordingly, students enrolled in state-approved online public schools have received the full Basic Education Allocation (BEA) per FTE student as students enrolled in traditional public schools—until the Legislature decided it could “save” money with a 15% cut in 2011. Now students enrolled in online public schools receive just 85% of BEA while students in traditional public schools continue to receive 100% funding.


The advocates held a rally at the Capitol steps Monday afternoon, finding their timing was a bit to win much news coverage. Most reporters were following Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum’s visit to the Capitol or were at the Office of the Secretary of State where critics of same-sex marriage were filing a referendum to repeal Washington’s new gay-marriage law.

Some strong advocates of basic education such as Rep. Kathy Haigh, a Shelton Democrat and chair of the House Education Appropriations and Oversight Committee, fought to retain funding last year for alternative education programs. The eventual cuts were less than originally proposed.

No word yet from Haigh on the lawsuit.

UPDATE on original 8:57 a.m. post: Rep. Haigh just sent me these comments about the ALE, or alternative learning environments, suit:

This is not unexpected. The cost to educate a student using on line has been debated but it seems to be a moving target. There are many different programs and some are not doing what they should be doing. The OSPI approved on line schools should probably have full funding, but they do not use school buses, lunch rooms, heat, light, etc. There are other cost by the companies that deliver the on line classes and it seems to be all over the board. We have worked on an ALE bill to identify the different models of public education within this category but ran into road blocks by several of the companies, including Gigi's program.

We will continue to work through this issue but I suspect the courts will find it as challenging as we have and there are good arguments on both sides of the issue. I will argue for full funding, but I know we are going to have to get more clear about what it is we are paying for and for measurable outcomes just like all the rest of our student must do.


Similar stories:

  • Cuts, dispute lead to online school closure

  • Pierce County online school will close

  • Pierce County online school to close

  • UPDATE - Supreme Court lays school funding onus on state

  • Ruling likely will save school days

COMMENTS Community Publishing Guidelines

Join the Reader Network

Do you want The Olympian to keep you in mind when we canvass the community for opinions?

Click here and sign up with our Reader Network to offer your view.


TOP JOBS

All Top Jobs  »