Controversial critical-areas ordinance closer to being OK'd

CHELSEA KROTZER | Staff writer • Published July 12, 2012

  • 0 comments

The Thurston County commissioners could soon approve a proposed critical-areas ordinance that has generated outrage among some residents.

IF YOU GO

The Thurston County commissioners will have another briefing on the critical-areas ordinance from 2-4 p.m. Monday in Building One, Room 280 at the Thurston County Courthouse, 2000 Lakeridge Drive S.W., Olympia. They tentatively plan another briefing later in the month.


County staffers and the commissioners are reviewing comments received during a public hearing last month with a goal of approving the revised ordinance as early as July 24. The hearing drew more than 300 people; about 100 testified.

The ordinance is an update to the original CAO, passed in 1994. The state Growth Management Act requires that the county review and, if necessary, revise the ordinance every seven years using the best available science.  

The ordinance protects five critical areas: those that are geologically hazardous, frequently flooded or critical for aquifer recharge; wetlands; and fish and wildlife habitat.

The county’s review of the ordinance began in 2003, with a 2005 deadline. The update was suspended because of staffing issues and resumed in 2007.

Commissioners Cathy Wolfe and Sandra Romero, as well as planning director Scott Clark, met with The Olympian’s editorial board Wednesday to discuss the proposed ordinance.

Because of several law changes since the original ordinance was enacted, a revision is a necessity, Wolfe said.

“The purpose of a review is to determine what to revise,” Clark said. “It’s updating with what changes in law have occurred and what changes you need to do that are required by that law.”

If the county does not update the ordinance, Wolfe said, it could become ineligible for grants or could lose local regulatory control to federal or state government.

In addition to updates, the proposed ordinance was drafted with readability in mind.

“We wanted to come back and write it so you could understand it,” Clark said. “It’s a complex document that we are trying to make as easy to read, and referable as possible.”

Before the county can approve the ordinance, the commissioners want to address a few remaining issues brought up by the public, including having clearer guidelines for reclaimed water and providing a better definition of agriculture.

“We want to preserve agriculture,” Romero said. “Especially with the movement toward more locally grown and healthy food … we just want to do it in a way we aren’t destroying the things we are trying to preserve.”

ckrotzer@theolympian.com
360-754-5476
theolympian.com/thisjustin
@chelseakrotzer

Similar stories:

  • Property, politics and pot — here are 2012’s top local stories

  • Pierce County working on its own pot rules

  • Thurston County to begin impact fees for new projects in April

  • Pocket gopher heading for Endangered Species Act listing

  • Gopher on its way to list of threatened

COMMENTS Community Publishing Guidelines

Join the Reader Network

Do you want The Olympian to keep you in mind when we canvass the community for opinions?

Click here and sign up with our Reader Network to offer your view.