Pensions for generals are out of line

VERNON DEARING | Lacey • Published November 26, 2012

  • 0 comments

I recently read about an Army general who is having one of his stars taken away for misconduct. As a result of this demotion his pension will shrink from $236,650 per year to a measly $202,802 annually. Something is seriously out of whack here. A career of honorable military service certainly entitles a man or woman to a comfortable retirement, but come on! When I was on a Navy riverboat in Vietnam we seldom saw an officer above the rank of Army captain, or Navy lieutenant in the field. Marines of course were another story altogether; they always had a full complement of majors and colonels “running” through the jungle. Hurrah!

Most senior officers spent their time either “at headquarters,” at the officers club or writing letters begging for a desk job in the Pentagon. Vietnam service was an important rung on the promotion ladder and a colorful campaign ribbon or two added to the salad bar on their chests didn’t hurt either. I can’t believe things have changed much since then. If anyone deserves an over-the-top retirement package it’s the staff sergeants and master sergeants who are the real glue that hold things together in the field and make things work, not a bunch of desk wonks that spend their days patting themselves and each other on the back. A $202,802 yearly pension? Give me a break. What do they think this is — the NFL?

Similar stories:

  • We don’t need to jettison pension plan that isn’t broken

  • Gregoire benefits from long-ago pension rules

  • D.C.-style gridlock leads Legislature to special session -- again

  • Health care for certain retirees a heavy burden

  • Daley set to challenge Democratic governor in Ill.

COMMENTS Community Publishing Guidelines

Join the Reader Network

Do you want The Olympian to keep you in mind when we canvass the community for opinions?

Click here and sign up with our Reader Network to offer your view.