Death penalty does make sense sometimes

OlympiaJanuary 4, 2013 

William Sprengler has made a case for the death penalty. According to his last written statement, he stated that “killing is what he liked to do best.” As a result of that mentality, three people had their lives ripped from them. Forever, their survivors will carry the pain of those killings.

Skilled attorneys and psychiatrists eagerly defend numerous killers, at the expense most often of the taxpayers, in an attempt to spare them the death penalty or to relieve them of their responsibility for killing another human being. Often, prosecutors opt for a “life” sentence due to the horrific costs of endless appeals and legal fees that must be paid by the public.

The ilk of Spengler, John Hinckley Jr., Jared Lee Loughner and the countless others do not merit the high cost of their public defense, nor the costs of keeping them in prison for an extended time. That extended time includes their legal expenses, health care and anything else that they deem necessary. The most recent police killer in Seattle has already cost the taxpayers more than $1 million dollars in legal fees alone, and was recently awarded his own television set. Had Spengler been put to death for beating his grandmother to death with a hammer, most likely his three victims would still be alive. The death penalty is not the end-all solution to murder. The death penalty does prevent those who murder because they like to from doing it again and again and again!

The Olympian is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service