Abortion notification hearing a full house

Bill would require minors seeking abortions to first notify parent/guardian

RACHEL LA CORTE | The Associated Press • Published February 07, 2013

  • 0 comments

A hearing on a bill that would require minors to notify their parents before terminating a pregnancy pitted those who argued it was an issue of parental rights against those who say the measure is an effort to restrict access to abortion.

The Senate Law & Justice Committee was packed Wednesday in Olympia with supporters and opponents of the measure, which denies a pregnant minor an abortion unless they had given at least 48 hours’ notice to one parent or a legal guardian. A pregnant teen could petition a superior court for a waiver of the notice requirement.

“This bill is not trying to stop abortions,” Sen. Don Benton, a Republican from Vancouver who sponsored the measure, told the committee. “What this bill is about is notifying parents of their children’s activities before they engage in them. It’s a common-sense right.”

Under the measure, anyone who performs an abortion on a minor without the proper notification requirements is guilty of a gross misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in local jail and/or a $5,000 fine. No notice is required if there is a medical emergency.

According to The Guttmacher Institute, which tracks reproductive health issues, 38 states require some type of parental involvement in a minor’s decision to have an abortion. More than 20 states require parental consent. Twelve others require parental notification only, and five require both official notification and consent.

Dr. Yolanda Evans, a pediatrician at Seattle Children’s Hospital who is opposed to the measure, said that most of the teens she sees with unintended pregnancies have the support of their parents.

Evans said she worries that, if required to notify parents, teens would try to find more dangerous means to end their pregnancies.

“I’m here to be a voice for my patients, not the ones who have parental support, but those vulnerable ones who don’t,” she said.

Similar stories:

  • Alaska Senate panel rebuts abortion experts' testimony

  • Democrats try again on abortion coverage

  • Abortion bill revised to fix drafting error

  • Critics of Alaska abortion bill fear risks to poor women

  • Some parents say body-fat measurements hurt children's self-esteem, pose other risks

COMMENTS Community Publishing Guidelines

Join the Reader Network

Do you want The Olympian to keep you in mind when we canvass the community for opinions?

Click here and sign up with our Reader Network to offer your view.