GOP senator sees conflict for project review leader

TheAssociated PressMarch 16, 2013 

A key Republican lawmaker said Friday that a consultant hired by the state’s Department of Transportation to review three large transportation projects has a conflict of interest.

Sen. Curtis King of Yakima, co-chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, said the choice of Ron Paananen to lead a review of the Alaskan Way Viaduct project, the State Route 520 Bridge replacement and the Columbia River Crossing project should be reconsidered.

King notes that Paananen worked on two of the projects as a Department of Transportation administrator before entering the private sector in 2011 and says his consultancy is receiving $2.4 million for work on the Columbia River Crossing.

“That is a clear conflict of interest,” King said.

King added that he does not question Paananen’s expertise.

Jaime Smith, spokeswoman for Gov. Jay Inslee, said Paananen is tasked with reviewing the department’s “internal processes” and not with looking at the projects themselves.

Paananen “has the technical expertise to lead such a review, and it’s because of his expertise and record of managing these kinds of projects that we feel he’ll help move (the Department of Transportation) down the path that Senator King, the Governor and the public want,” Smith said in a written statement.

Last month, the Department of Transportation admitted that mistakes in the construction of pontoons that will make up the new floating State Route 520 Bridge led to cracking that could in turn allow water inside them. Repairs will cost in the tens of millions of dollars, then-Transportation Secretary Paula Hammond said.

The Olympian is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service