Food Co-op policies still divisive after 3 years

OlympiaJuly 24, 2013 

Three years ago, at a meeting that only boycott supporters attended, the Olympia Food Co-op’s board decided to boycott Israeli products.

There was no public notification to members that the issue was pending. The co-op’s official policy, that boycotts are to be adopted through staff consensus, was ignored.

After many months of futile efforts to re-open the process, a lawsuit was brought by five co-op members challenging the way the boycott was adopted. The fallout from this has been a tarnishing of cooperative principles in the name of social justice.

Was the co-op’s board supporting free speech when it failed to include anti-boycott voices in its decision-making meeting and when it discouraged concerned staff from attending? Was the Board democratic when it asserted that any vote to rescind would need to go through the member-initiated process where a super-majority 60 percent vote would be required? Was the board kind when it retaliated against the members who brought the lawsuit with a countersuit for substantial monetary damages?

And is the co-op a community-building organization when it continues, three years after its decision, to avoid open discussion and a reconsideration of the boycott?

As for me, I now go out of my way to shop at the Madison Street Co-op in Seattle. It’s friendly, clean, and has what I want to buy.

The Olympian is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service