Benefits of the lake outweigh an estuary

OlympiaAugust 1, 2013 

There is no doubt that Capitol Lake is enjoyed by many for it’s beauty. Swimming and Eltoro sail boats were a pastime for many. A number think the dam should be removed in order to make salmon passage easier.

People who prefer the lake are accused of ignoring the social advantages of reverting to an estuary. The stream proponents ignore the problems of mosquitos and noxious weeds developing in the mud on the lake bottom. Siltation in South Bay is underestimated. Ignored is the liability involved in not dredging South Bay and the difficult job of dredging many improvements in and around marine interests. Siltation must be dredged to protect the economic needs of the port as well as boating enthusiasts.

It’s hard to understand why an estuary is desirable given the ugly tide flat on the east side of the peninsula. Does anyone trust the state to maintain the estuary above Fourth Avenue? Solutions include eliminating sewage drainage into the Deschutes by Thurston County and property owners.

The state has ignored the need for dredging the lake for many years. Such deferred maintenance results in undesirable growth and results in much higher costs than would be required with relatively small annual maintenance. Dredging is required for either solution.

Each alternative is difficult and requires work and relies on dedicated people and funds for the problems created. I believe the esthetic and recreation advantages of retaining Capitol Lake far outweighs an estuary.

The Olympian is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service