Fact-checking Gunn’s statements in guide

OlympiaOctober 20, 2013 

The Thurston County voters pamphlet does not fact-check candidates’ statements. Therefore, I am submitting the following correction of Sue Gunn’s statement that the port’s most recent general bond obligation is paying in part to “expand the marine terminal, the biggest money loser.” In fact, $9 million of the bond will provide funds to dredge the marine terminal of sediments that are polluted with dioxin and other stormwater runoff pollutants. According to the Washington Environment Council, polluted stormwater runoff is the No. 1 contributor to pollution in Puget Sound.

The port’s investment in removing such pollution, not caused by marine terminal operations, is an appropriate taxpayer expenditure, but according to the port’s FAQ’s dated Aug. 8, item 7, the cost will be paid by port customers.

By the way, another $9 million of the bond will pay for stormwater treatment, another valid public purpose, which has an estimated 4.48 percent return on investment (FAQs, item 15).

If Gunn thinks the port should not be subsidized, then it should be privatized.

The Olympian is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service