Leave drone program well enough alone

TumwaterNovember 15, 2013 

Thanks for The Olympian’s front page photo this Thursday about the use of drone strikes in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Whether or not one supports U.S. military and intelligence involvement in those nations, the application of such force has become more and more surgically precise, which reduces casualties among terrorists/combatants and innocent civilians alike.

The change from carpet bombing to more and more precise targeting began when I was a combat aircrew member during the Southeast Asia conflict. Rules of engagement were conservative and were adhered to assiduously. This resulted in fewer overall casualties, less lasting hostility, and diminished environmental degradation. One statistic that should have been added to your photo caption and Page A6 story is that, since the beginning of 2012, there has not been a single innocent civilian casualty in Pakistan due to drone strikes. That’s why, as your article put it, “Officials at the CIA and the Defense Department are loathe to try to fix a program that they don’t think is broken.”

The Olympian is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service