Lawmaker wants to ban breed-based dog regulations

The Seattle TimesJanuary 14, 2014 

A bill introduced in the House would eliminate a dog’s breed as a consideration in determining whether it is dangerous.

House Bill 2117 would prevent cities from creating breed-based restrictions for dog owners and would instead use behavior to decide if a dog was dangerous or potentially dangerous.

Under state law, a dangerous dog is one that injures a person or kills a pet without being provoked. A potentially dangerous dog is one that bites or threatens the safety of a person or pet without being provoked.

Rep. Sherry Appleton, D-Poulsbo, is sponsoring the bill. She said it’s “counterproductive and discriminatory” to restrict responsible dog owners and that a dog’s behavior can’t be predicted by its breed alone.

“I had a friend that was attacked and disfigured by a beagle. That’s Snoopy,” Appleton said. “It just depends on how a dog is treated.”

The bill, which would overturn existing breed-based legislation in cities, is scheduled for public hearing in the House Judiciary at 8 a.m. Thursday.

The Olympian is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service