State lawmakers tackle privacy in the air, on the Internet

One proposed bill would ban drone surveillance above private property

The Associated PressJanuary 17, 2014 

Washington lawmakers on Thursday considered three bills related to privacy concerning drones, government surveillance and online content.

The bills, heard before the House Technology and Economic Development Committee, were introduced by Rep. Jeff Morris, D-Mount Vernon, who said that the intent is to get some rules in place before technology gets too far down the road. The bills come amid a national debate over government surveillance sparked by revelations of extensive federal monitoring of telephone activity.

House Bill 2178 would ban the unauthorized use of unmanned aircraft with sensing devices in the airspace above private property. Under the measure, drones capable of gathering personal information such as photos could be used on private property if permission is given from landowners or tenants of the property and if the drones are labeled with the owner’s contact information.

The bill also states that unmanned aircraft could be flown over public land if done in a manner that does not unreasonably interfere with the rights of others or isn’t otherwise prohibited by law. Violation of the rules would result in a gross misdemeanor charge.

The bill was introduced after the House committee was tasked with taking a look at what Morris called “invasive technologies.”

“Drones aren’t inherently bad. It just depends on how they are used,” he said. “This just says if you’ve got recording devices and stuff, you have to get permission.”

Several people who testified at the hearing felt the bill would go too far.

Mark Slayton of Bremerton said he believes the bill seeks to protect privacy where privacy is explicitly not guaranteed.

“If I want to look inside someone’s house, I can see in from the street,” said Slayton, who told the committee he was also a member of a group who flies unmanned vehicles as a hobby.

He suggested the bill be rewritten to address specific intrusion into the immediate surroundings of a home.

Concerns were also expressed about how the bill would affect the use of drones in fighting wildfires.

Two other bills were heard Thursday. One, House Bill 2179, would prohibit state and local governmental agencies from conducting unauthorized surveillance on private property using extraordinary sensory devices. These would include devices unseen and undetected by the public, Morris said.

Another, House Bill 2180, would allow people to remove content they have posted online. It’s similar to a law passed in California that allows minors to remove content they have posted. The Washington bill would allow anyone to remove content they have posted.

“A mistake can become a lifetime of humiliations, and I think that’s what we’re trying to get to here,” Morris said.

The Olympian is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service