Oil export terminals are too risky to public

OlympiaMay 14, 2014 

Proposals to expand export facilities in Grays Harbor to ship toxic North American petrochemicals to Asia are absolutely irresponsible. These new facilities would receive “crude by rail” including light crude oil, highly flammable Bakken shale crude and very dangerous diluted bitumen from Alberta’s tar sands fields.

Clearly, the rail infrastructure in our region was never intended for this hazardous material — no jurisdictions along the route are capable of effectively responding to spills, fires and explosions on water or land of this toxic material.

Crude by rail destined for export markets via Washington state must be banned. Its risks to public heal and safety and to ecosystem security far outweigh purported economic gain.

The Olympian is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service