This Godzilla is big, somewhat bad but not much fun

Contributing writerMay 16, 2014 

* * *

Godzilla

Director: Gareth Edwards

Cast: Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Ken Watanabe and Bryan Cranston

Running time: 2:03

Rating: PG-13; intense sequences of destruction, mayhem and creature violence “We call him … Gojira.”

Thus does the newest, American-made “Godzilla” acknowledge the origins of the King of Monsters, putting those words into the mouth of a Japanese scientist played by Ken Watanabe, who knows a thing or two about the nuclearized origins of the great scaly beast. His character’s father was in Hiroshima when the bomb dropped.

Not long afterward, awakened, irradiated and mad as hell, the prehistoric gargantua arose from the ocean depths, a fire-breathing symbol of Japan’s well-founded atomic phobia.

So Godzilla returns in “Godzilla,” bigger than ever, 355 feet of reptilian menace (he was 164 feet tall in the 1954 Japanese origin movie), and badder … well, hmmm.

Definitions of terms like “good” and “bad” get a little slippery when discussing the big guy. Early on, he was truly bad, shredding Japan and its armed forces repeatedly. But in later movies, as he became a pop culture icon, he fought monsters even badder than himself and evolved into a kind of ally of humans. Still, in those battles he shredded Japan and its armed forces repeatedly. With friends like that …

There’s plenty of city shredding in this newest “Godzilla.” Honolulu, aloha. San Francisco, sorry about that. Oh no! Not the Golden Gate Bridge again!

Godzilla is in what passes for his “good” mode here because there are a couple of other creatures on the scene even meaner than him, and they get way more screen time than the big guy. So much, in fact, that Godzilla is practically a supporting character in his own movie.

Apparently, director Gareth Edwards decided to do a “Jaws” with Godzilla, hiding him from view for much of the picture. He teases the audience with a closeup of a big lizard foot here — Stomp! — and multiple peeks at spiky dorsal fins sliding through the sea to pique our curiosity about the beast’s appearance.

Godzilla’s adversaries look like the hellish spawn of Rodan and the Alien with their slime-oozing, fang-packed mouths and big leathery wings. They maraud across the planet searching for their favorite food: radioactive materials. They gobble nuclear warheads like M&Ms.

Ineffectually opposing their rampage is the U.S. military. As the Japanese learned long ago, neither tanks nor jets nor missiles do anything other than annoy Godzilla and his ilk.

Watanabe knows what must be done: “Let them fight.” And then finally we see Godzilla in all his state-of-the-art CG glory, going claw-to-claw with the nuke-eaters, blasting them with his radioactive fire breath and deafening them with his trademark bellow.

Edwards hits the anti-nuclear angle hard and works diligently early on to humanize the issue by concentrating on the efforts of a traumatized engineer played by Bryan Cranston to expose a government cover-up of the monster menace and its atomic origins.

But although the actors (including Aaron Taylor-Johnson as the Cranston character’s Navy officer son) are better at their craft than their counterparts in the Japanese movies, the dialogue they’re obliged to deliver is still quite hackneyed.

The Japanese “Godzillas,” with their awful acting and cheesy special effects, have a campy quality that makes them oddly endearing. Edwards’ “Godzilla,” far more technically impressive and more realistic-seeming, isn’t quite as much fun. As cities are reduced to dusty ruins and fleeing survivors jam highways, echoes of Sept. 11 resonate unmistakably, and that significantly dilutes the fun factor.

The Olympian is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service