The Olympian Logo

Editorial: New legislative records proposal fails on public transparency | The Olympian

×
  • E-edition
  • Home
    • Customer Service
    • About Us
    • Buy Photos and Pages
    • Contact Us
    • Plus
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Newsletters
    • Newspaper in Education
    • Subscribe
    • Subscriber Services
    • Archives

    • News
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Databases
    • Death Notices
    • Education
    • Local News
    • Military News
    • Obituaries
    • Politics & Government
    • State
    • Traffic
    • Watchdog
    • Weather
    • Opinion
    • Cartoons
    • Editorials
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Opinion Columns
    • Submit a Letter
    • Sports
    • College
    • High School
    • Mariners
    • Preps Stats
    • Seahawks
    • Sounders
    • UW Huskies
    • Politics
    • Living
    • Announcements
    • Food
    • Health & Fitness
    • Home & Garden
    • Travel
    • Entertainment
    • Arts & Culture
    • Comics
    • Puzzles & Games
    • Events Calendar
    • Horoscopes
    • Movies
    • Restaurants
    • Outdoors
    • Fishing

  • Classifieds
  • Jobs
  • Moonlighting
  • Cars
  • Homes
  • Place An Ad
  • Mobile & Apps

Editorials

Editorial: New legislative records proposal fails on public transparency

By The Seattle Times Editorial Board

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 04, 2019 07:14 PM

Citizens have good reason to be concerned about a new proposal that would exempt Washington legislators from parts of the state’s Public Records Act.

This proposal is much like an unpopular bill lawmakers jammed through last year, touching off a public uproar that prompted the governor’s veto. The new measure includes overly broad exceptions for legislators. This latitude to withhold government documents would obscure how state lawmakers arrive at policy decisions, as well as who is influencing them.

In effect, these provisions would allow legislators to conceal more of their working documents from the public than other state and local elected officials can.

This double standard remains the fundamental underpinning of the new legislation. And it remains unacceptable.

SIGN UP

Sign Up and Save

Get six months of free digital access to The Olympian

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

#ReadLocal

Senate Bill 5784 – sponsored by state Sen. Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle – is expected to have a public hearing Feb. 13.

Citizens should use the time between now and then to voice concerns they have about the measure – and to urge the Legislature to follow the Public Records Act as it presently exists.

Members of the public did not have this same opportunity to comment last February. Over the course of a mere 48 hours, legislative leaders introduced and passed a bill that permanently closed off access to lawmakers’ past emails, calendars, disciplinary records and other government documents.

This heinous rush job came only a month after a Thurston County judge ruled that lawmakers had been illegally flouting the Public Records Act for years.

About 20,000 citizens contacted Gov. Jay Inslee to ask him to veto last year’s legislation, which he did.

But, outside of ample opportunity for public comment, Pedersen’s new attempt in some ways doesn’t look much different.

To start, the bill would permanently shutter access to all past and future records concerning legislators’ deliberative process, adding exemptions so expansive that they could be used to justify withholding almost any document. These provisions would prevent the release not only of draft versions of bills and emails discussing legislation, but also important policy analyses prepared by legislative staff.

Such analyses can help illuminate, for instance, how a school-funding plan would affect all of the state’s 295 school districts, or how a proposed policy change might raise or lower residents’ taxes. This is important information that influences how lawmakers vote, and citizens should be able to review it.

The real rub is that lawmakers would never have to release these documents, even after a bill has been passed into law. That’s a stark departure from the existing rules in the Public Records Act, which require other government officials to share records of their deliberative processes after they make a decision.

The bill would also withhold the names and contact information of just about anyone who writes a legislator to lodge a complaint or urge action on legislation, unless the person is a registered lobbyist or an employer of one. This dispensation is not one the law grants to other public officials – not local fire commissioners, city council members, nor the governor. This would create unacceptable opacity surrounding who is trying to influence state legislators, as well as how lawmakers respond to feedback from their constituents.

Yet perhaps the most worrisome part of the bill is how it would withhold records of misconduct investigations. The measure would permanently exempt all witness statements and investigators’ notes, limiting the public’s ability to see whether the Legislature handled complaints appropriately.

This should be of paramount concern in the #MeToo era, which has led to several lawmakers being accused of sexual harassment or other misconduct. It is especially odious given the Legislature’s history of handling complaints informally or sweeping them under the rug.

And, what’s more, these documents are ones lawmakers are already required to release under current law, according to the trial court’s decision from last January. The Legislature is now appealing the ruling in that case, which was brought by 10 media organizations, including The Associated Press and The Seattle Times.

Once again, lawmakers are deceptively billing this new legislation as a step toward greater disclosure.

And, once again, they are ignoring that breaking the law in the past does not entitle them to special treatment in the future.

  Comments  

Videos

Mike Hopkins on UW’s win over Washington State

Tim Eyman under investigation in theft of chair from Lacey Office Depot

View More Video

Trending Stories

Another storm, another big question: Why was power out for so long?

February 16, 2019 07:00 AM

Thurston County students didn’t return to school until Friday. What took so long?

February 15, 2019 08:11 AM

One dead after travel trailer catches fire in Mason County

February 15, 2019 08:37 AM

Man closed lid on their hot tub while wife was still in it, say police. She died.

February 15, 2019 09:29 AM

Deaths for Feb. 16

February 16, 2019 01:46 AM
Local display advertising by PaperG

Read Next

Editorials

Planning for the long term may be more than human brains can handle

By The Olympian Editorial Board

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 15, 2019 03:46 PM

The draft plan for dealing with climate change and sea level rise strains our capacity to think about and plan for a future we cannot really imagine, well beyond our own lifetimes. But we definitely need to think longer term about a new county courthouse.

KEEP READING

Sign Up and Save

#ReadLocal

Get six months of free digital access to The Olympian

SUBSCRIBE WITH GOOGLE

MORE EDITORIALS

Editorials

Editorial: Investigating Trump should be a bipartisan affair

February 12, 2019 02:55 PM

Editorials

Editorial: Relaxing law on motorcycle helmets foolish

February 08, 2019 12:23 PM
Bravo to Tumwater and tiny home volunteers, but hearty jeers to scofflaw sheriffs

Editorials

Bravo to Tumwater and tiny home volunteers, but hearty jeers to scofflaw sheriffs

February 08, 2019 12:10 PM

Editorials

Editorial: Test all Washington schools for lead in water

February 06, 2019 02:31 PM

Editorials

Editorial: State Senate makes right call to allow remote video testimony

February 04, 2019 07:24 PM
A visit to Rochester reveals the struggles of Thurston County’s rural communities

Editorials

A visit to Rochester reveals the struggles of Thurston County’s rural communities

February 01, 2019 07:00 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

The Olympian App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Start a Subscription
  • Customer Service
  • eEdition
  • Contests-Promotions
  • Vacation Hold
  • Rewards
  • Pay Your Bill
Learn More
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletters
  • News in Education
  • Photo Store
  • Archives
Advertising
  • Information
  • Place a Classified
  • Local Deals
  • Place an Obituary
  • Today's Circulars
  • Special Sections
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story