As state Sen. Andy Hill stuck to his message over months of budget negotiations — new taxes only as a last resort — he watched the Democrats’ revenue proposals melt away.
First went Gov. Jay Inslee’s proposed carbon-emissions tax, never adopted in a legislative budget proposal. House Democratic proposals for a business-and-occupation tax hike and a new capital-gains tax also evaporated.
In the end, even several tax exemptions closed in the new $38.2 billion state operating budget — a compromise made with Democrats to raise some revenue — were chosen by Republicans.
A 53-year-old, soccer-loving Harvard MBA and former Microsoft group manager from Redmond, Hill played the public face of the GOP message during the grueling, extended legislative season that ended Friday. Reality was simple, the chief Republican budget writer argued: New revenue from existing taxes should be enough to cover the cost of government.
Digital Access for only $0.99
For the most comprehensive local coverage, subscribe today.
He repeated it over and over, in news conferences and interviews, like a looped recording. Whether it was political acumen or just the luck of pushing the same hold-the-line message as revenue reports brought the money in, Hill and his Republican colleagues emerged crowing about a budget that cut college tuition, put more money toward education and raised little new revenue.
“We think that when we started in January, we had a set of priorities,” Hill said the day the budget compromise was released. “And we believe we delivered on all of them.”
Now Hill, first elected in 2010, is getting what comes with a successful GOP run in Olympia: chatter that he could be the party’s best hope for challenging Inslee in 2016, and Democratic criticism that Republicans remain too conservative for many.
Back in January, the budget that came to be didn’t necessarily seem plausible. Lawmakers began work under an unprecedented series of obligations. They were being held in contempt for not doing enough to fully plan to fund K-12 education under the state Supreme Court’s McCleary decision. Other court orders were forcing legislators to better fund mental-health and foster-care programs.
Legislators also wanted to give government workers and school employees their first cost-of-living raises in years. There were questions over how to repair the social-safety net and make college more affordable — two areas that had taken a hit during the Great Recession.
During the prolonged stalemate over the budget, the ground shifted. Two economic forecasts and newfound federal money brought projections of more than $750 million through 2017.
Buoyed by timing and luck, the GOP stood vindicated.
That windfall helped build a budget that some are calling historic for its investments in early learning and K-12 education funding, and mental-health and social-service improvements. The budget, signed by Inslee shortly before midnight on June 30, included the cost-of-living pay raises and also boosted funding for state parks.
It also bought a unique policy, sought by Republicans — a tuition cut for state colleges and universities.
While that proposal had been pushed earlier by others in the GOP, Senate Majority Leader Mark Schoesler, R-Ritzville, said Hill helped make it possible.
“When Andy Hill showed us the savings and resources we could use to write a budget with,” Schoesler said, “he showed us we could afford a tuition cut.”
The narrative about this year’s session, however, is more complex than the headlines.
Democrats panned Hill’s budget proposals as full of gimmicks that moved money between accounts and underfunded services such as mental-health programs and the state’s health-care insurance exchange.
The budget that eventually got written “could not have been done without $500 million to $700 million worth of positive economic news,” said Rep. Ross Hunter of Medina, the chief Democratic budget writer.
Democrats said they had to fight up until the end of negotiations to make sure the GOP’s tuition cut was properly funded, as were needed mental-health improvements, according to Hunter.
But former state Republican party chairman Chris Vance praised Hill and Senate Republicans for fighting to cut tuition at state universities — a move he said reversed years of declining state support under Democratic administrations while also appealing to middle-class voters needed by the GOP to win statewide.
“It is in some ways one of the quintessential cul-de-sac suburban issues,” Vance said. “Republicans have to do better in the suburbs to make up for what they lose in Seattle.”
Hill hasn’t signaled what he’ll do.
“I’m still getting over the budget hangover,” he said.
Hill ascended to the powerful position of Senate Ways and Means chairman in 2013 because of his educational background — and because more experienced Republicans were busy with other roles, according to Schoesler.
“He’s an amazingly fast study,” Schoesler said. Budget writers “can live or die by a lot of small decisions, and you’ve got a ton of those to go through.”
For a party that spans from the rock-ribbed conservative eastern half of the state to a more moderate segment west of the Cascades, Republicans aren’t always in agreement.
Hill has to work with more conservative senators, like a trio who after one revenue forecast proposed using some of the extra money to cut business taxes rather than firm up the budget.
“Andy has a lot of members where, even if it makes sense, they don’t want to spend the money,” said former Senate Majority Leader Rodney Tom, who in 2012 was one of two Democrats who crossed the aisle to work with Republicans. “There’s a contingent of the Republican Party that’s Jeffersonian, they really want smaller government.”
As Hill gets mentioned as a possible Inslee challenger next year, so do state Sen. Steve Litzow, R-Mercer Island, who chairs the Senate Education Committee, and U.S. Rep. Dave Reichert, R-Auburn.
Port of Seattle Commissioner Bill Bryant has a head start — he declared his candidacy in May.
Whether or not Hill runs, Vance called his record as budget writer “the kind of model that can win in Washington state.”
But Democratic political consultant Christian Sinderman hits back against Hill’s image as a suburban moderate, calling him “an ideological conservative cloaked in suburban soccer-dad apparel.”
Environmentalists accuse Hill and the Senate Republican majority of siding with fossil-fuel interests and opposing legislation aimed at fighting climate change, including Inslee’s proposed cap-and-trade plan to limit carbon emissions through charges on big polluters. The Senate also refused to close a tax loophole benefiting oil refineries.
“There was a chance for real bipartisan progress this session. He chose to serve the interests of Big Oil, rather than the interests of Washingtonians,” said Shannon Murphy, president of Washington Conservation Voters, which spent big to try to defeat Hill’s re-election bid.
Hill has been among the biggest recipients of oil- and gas-industry campaign contributions among Washington legislators since 2012, according to the National Institute on Money in State Politics.
California billionaire and Inslee ally Tom Steyer unsuccessfully took aim at Hill as one of a handful of Republican senators to unseat in order to bring about a Legislature more friendly to climate change.
Hill, who drives a BMW electric car, said the Legislature didn’t act on climate change this year because lawmakers had too much else to do.
In conversation, Hill is reluctant to take shots at Inslee. But, “I do think we need new leadership,” he said.
To win a statewide election, Hill repeats the wisdom that a Republican candidate needs to draw enough votes in suburban King County to offset the large urban blocks that vote Democratic.
“Generally, the suburban voters … their view is, ‘Educate my kids, be smart with my money and leave everybody else alone,’” he said. “In a lot of ways it is a socially moderate and a fiscally conservative viewpoint.”
“And I kind of fit that,” Hill adds later.
Seattle Times reporter Jim Brunner contributed to this report.